On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, at 03:43 AM, Joel Hacker wrote:
> Any particular reason why we have to compile 3.0.7 anyway? I mean, I > understand that some of the changes under the hood in 10.2 may require > updated debianutils, and maybe the newer XDarwin, but why use an > unstable KDE? I didn't want to sit through 18 hours of watching my > computer compile KDE so I have just been using IceWM instead. I'm > going to comment out the unstable trees and simply apt-get bundle-kde > to simply get the 3.0.2 binary and try running it and let you all know > how well/if it works. Will post sometime tomorrow the results, time > for bed now. If you're on Jaguar, the 3.0.2 binaries won't work right, they were built against 10.1. Binaries built on 10.1 that use C++ are not compatible with those built on 10.2. The reason you have to compile it is because I haven't released a binary dist for KDE on jaguar yet. =) It's in the works, but if you don't want to wait, compiling is the only option right now. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
