I am not aware of the reason why bash is included only now with Jaguar released (OS X 10.2) and not before.
There might be an interesting answer though.
On Saturday, November 23, 2002, at 09:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Thomas McFadden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>--
Date: Sat Nov 23, 2002 8:02:36 PM Europe/Zurich
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Fink-users] Re: emacs21 weird behavior: solved and bash question
[snip]Message: 2 Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:22:05 +0100 From: Massimo Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Fink-users] emacs21 weird behavior: solvedThomas, of course you are right but the problem was not even *showing* in that 'which emacs' ALWAYS reported /sw/bin/emacs and not /usr/bin/emacs
yeah, sorry my reply ended up being completely redundant. i get the mails
in digest form, so i'm always a little behind. i had no idea the problem
was going to turn out to be so interesting with the intricacies of which
in bash etc. which brings me to a slightly OT question. i was sort of
surprised to see that OSX 10.1 didn't ship with bash. i haven't upgraded
to Jaguar yet, but apparently it does provide bash along with the other
usual suspects. is this correct? any idea why they left it out in the
first place and are now including it? just curious.
-Tom
Massimo Marino
NERSC Division - HPC Department
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~marino
On leave at CERN, CH, EP Division, Atlas experiment
phone: (+41) 22 767-1288 fax: (+41) 22 767-8350 Office: 40-3-D16
alternate email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
