Dave Vasilevsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:If a package were built in user-mode, the executables and libraries built would be owned by that user, and they'd be put in the .deb and then installed, all owned by that user.
This sounds like a .deb limitation; switching to .rpm would solve this very issue.
How is it a .deb issue? You build a .deb from a root tree, just like RPM, and of course it has to use the user/group/permissions that exist in that root tree. I'm fairly certain RPM does the same--how else would it deal with installing a .rpm with files owned by different users?
Kindly enlighten me! :-)
vasi
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
