On vendredi, sep 12, 2003, at 18:03 Europe/Paris, Viktor Haag wrote:

It seems that the plain version of rsync is available through
fink, but not 'rsyncX' with the HFS extensions. Is there a reason
for this? It would seem more sensible to offer rsyncX through
fink rather than just the plain one (or perhaps both?).

Is this usable now? The last two times I looked at this it wasn't (but this was probably and two years ago, respecively) . It worked only if you had rsyncX at both ends, it replaced the standard rsync in an incompatible way without warning, and it destroyed files when used with standard rsync at the other end.


In addition, it was a weird project, using and changing the standard rsync sources without indicating where they were changed, without decent copyright notices etc., in short something I wouldn't want to touch. Maybe all this is now corrected?

I agree it would make more sense to have this in Fink than the standard rsync which is already in OSX.

--
Martin




------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to