On 26.02.2004, at 13:40, David R. Morrison wrote:
Actually, in the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree you shouldn't change the GCC field to 3.1;
in that tree, it is supposed to be 3.3.
Ah, yes, sure. What was i thinking... You are right of cause.
So backporting may be quite easy after all.
Yes. It is just a matter of doing it and tracking all dependencies.
Thanks for correcting me, Chris.
Christian Schaffner wrote:
Hi Jack
On 25.02.2004, at 19:23, Jack Repenning wrote:On Feb 23, 2004, at 9:43 AM, Christian Schaffner wrote:The Fink packages (<http://fink.sf.net>) are now available for the final release of Subversion 1.0.0 in the MacOS X 10.3 unstable tree:
Is there any plan to build 1.0.0 for 10.2?
It should build almost as it it right now for 10.2 too. The problem is that a few of the needed dependencies are not yet ported back to the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree. I hope i can do it eventually but haven't got the resources at the moment.
If not, I'll be building my own ... can I contribute to finkization?
Sure. :) You could try move the dependencies to the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree, see if they build, and report to the respective package maintainers. Ask them if they move their packages. Mostly you just need to change the GCC fiels to 3.1 (if the packages have it) and adjust the dependecies. Also the package revisions should be lower than in the 10.3 tree if the GCC field is available, to allow easy upgrading.
Then you can try to adapt the svn 10.3 package to the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree,
too.
That would help a lot! Thanks, Chris.
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
