I wholeheartedly agree with Martin. Ever since I began enjoying Fink, I've always opted for source distribution but I sure do not want to have to wrangle with CVS to get it. Heck, the day Fink came out with rsync selfupdating was a happy day indeed ! If there were to be no other option but CVS, I'd rather stay with 0.5.1 or forget Fink Commander altogether and go back to command line.

J. Courcoul

On Apr 19, 2004, at 6:28 PM, Ben Hines wrote:

Why?

-Ben

On Apr 18, 2004, at 11:34 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:

Ben Hines wrote:
Version 0.5.3 of FinkCommander has been released. This version is a bug-fix release, which fixes the bug added in 0.5.2 where all packages showed as stable.

Hi Ben,


would it be too much to ask to put a source tarball on the finkcommander sourceforge site, as it used to be until 0.5.1?

--
Martin




------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users



------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to