On Jun 30, 2004, at 3:01 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Also, to satisfy my curiosity, why wasn't 2.4 put in stable when 2.5 came around?
I have no idea. Maybe nobody bothered giving positive feedback to the package's Maintainer? Or else some of its dependencies are not in stable (gotta make sure stable is completely self-reliant).
Ok, that's a place to start. As far as I can tell, all of wxgtk's BuildDepends and Depends packages are in stable. Granted, for some of these packages I have the unstable version installed, but for each of these there is a stable package of equal or greater version than prescribed by wxgtk. On a side note: it would be great if I could specify to only use unstable version when there is no stable version of the package.
So, allow me to thus say that wxgtk-2.4 works great (from a users's perspective)! please add it to stable!
--Matthew Peltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
