Hi Remi, 
Am Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:34:48 -0700, schrieb Remi Mommsen:
>>>>>>>>  I have the following problem building libxklavier1:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>  ...
>>>>>>>>  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -no-cpp-precomp -I/sw/include
>>>>>>>>  -DDATA_DIR=\"/sw/share/libxklavier\" -I. -I/sw/include
>>>>>>>>  -I/sw/include/libxml2 -I/sw/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I.. -O3
>>>>>>>>  -funroll-loops -fstrict-aliasing -MT xklavier_config_xkb.lo -MD
>>>>>>>>  -MP -MF .deps/xklavier_config_xkb.Tpo -c xklavier_config_xkb.c
>>>>>>>>  -fno-common -DPIC -o .libs/xklavier_config_xkb.o
>>>>>>>>  xklavier_config_xkb.c: In function `_XklGetRulesSet':
>>>>>>>>  xklavier_config_xkb.c:43: error: `XKB_RF_NAMES_PROP_ATOM'
>>>>>>>>  undeclared (first use in this function)
>>> 
>>> In that command line, I am seeing an additional
>>> -DXKB_HEADERS_PRESENT=1 flag. There is no error message. The
>>> difference is that I have Apple's X11 installed. So it is quite
>>> possible that this package does not build with xfree86-4.4.0.
>>> 
>>> Is it supposed to work, anyway? AFAIK, the xkb stuff isn't used,
>>> neither by Apple's X11 nor by XDarwin.
>> 
>> I donnot know if it is supposed to work anyway but for me I can say
>> that I use Xfree86 4.4.0. Do you know which app depends on
>> libxklavier1 as I only try to update bundle-gnome.
> 
> I ran into the same problem upgrading gnome. Do you have any 
> solution for it? Shall we open a formal bug tracker item?

There was a fix for this in another thread. I donnot know if a bug 
has been filled out for this fix or if a new version of 
libxklavier1 is available that fixes the problem. If both isn't the 
fact, we should inform the package maintainer and/or open a bug 
tracker item. 

The solution was to do add the following line to your 
libxklavier1.info:

I fixed it here (equivalently) with the following diff :

< SetCPPFLAGS: -no-cpp-precomp
---
> NoSetCPPFLAGS: true
> CompileScript: export CPATH="/usr/X11R6/include:%p/include"; ./configure 
%c; make

Best,

JF
  
After adding this line, you need to run fink index again and 
afterwards you should be able to update to gnome 2.6. Up to now I 
have the impression that gnome 2.6 is a bit faster then 2.4 was. 

Regards,
Eric Hoch

-- 
## Ansprechpartner Anwenderunterst�tzung, users-Mailingliste
## War unsere Hilfe erfolgreich? Bitte teilen Sie es uns mit. Danke.
## de.OpenOffice.org - Office f�r MacOS X, Linux, Solaris & Windows 
## Netikette? http://www.eschkitai.de/openoffice/netikette.html


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idG21&alloc_id040&op=click
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to