Fair enough -- I knew there was a reason. I don't mind the compile time, as it can just work in the background. It does hit heavy on my QT7 video frame rate though... 8)
On 5/16/05, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Viktor Haag wrote: > > > I'm sure there's a reason for the fact that this gnupg update requires > > *19* new packages to get installed, but it still strikes me as a tad > > excessive and a bit of "feature bloat"... I mean documentation is > > important, but what's wrong with some nice, self-contained manpages > > (or even texinfo files) -- do we really need to write a utility's > > documentation using DocBook? > > Well, the issue is not that gnupg needs docbook, but something else that > gnupg actually depends on, but wasn't in the dependency list, wants it > to build. > > gnupg was missing a *ton* of builddependencies, and failed to build at > all in it's current incarnation on tiger unless you already happened to > have a bunch of crypto stuff and one of the readline dev packages installed. > > If you're really concerned about the build time, you can apt-get the > rest of the dependencies, most likely, but this was a change that should > have been made. > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt12&alloc_id344&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
