On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 07:04:07PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> 
> Yes, the new pkgconfig is definitely broken. It doesn't honor the 
> Requires: field in the pc files.

Looks like they made that an optional behavior, and on OS X:

  checking whether to list both direct and indirect dependencies... no

based on some libtool setting that I don't understand. I just
committed 0.17.2-2 that forces that to "yes", and...

>  0.17.2
>  % pkg-config --libs libgnome-2.0
>  -L/sw/lib -lgnome-2 -lpopt
> 
>  0.15.0
>  % pkg-config --libs libgnome-2.0
>  -L/sw/lib -lgnome-2 -lpopt -lbonobo-2 -lgconf-2 -lgnomevfs-2 
> -lbonobo-activation -lORBit-2 -lm -lgmodule-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lglib-2.0 
> -lintl -liconv

...it now gives me the same list as 0.15.0 for that case.

dan

-- 
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.  How far can you shotput
a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge track?
If you want to score the big prize, get to know the little guy.  
Play to win an NEC 61" plasma display: http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to