On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 01:38:23PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: > Mick Weiss wrote: > [] > >cd doc && make html > >texi2html -split_chapter ./autoconf.texi > >** Unknown command [EMAIL PROTECTED]' (left as is) (l. 8) > [] > >install -m 644 doc/*.html > >/sw/src/root-autoconf2.5-2.59-6/sw/share/doc/autoconf2.5/html/ > >install: doc/*.html: No such file or directory > >### execution of install failed, exit code 71 > >Failed: installing autoconf2.5-2.59-6 failed > > For some reason it is using the wrong texi2html. What do you get from > "which texi2html" and "texi2html --version"? Fink's texi2html is at > version 1.64 which is older than the one in /usr/bin and any other one > that you might have installed yourself elsewhere, precisely for reasons > like the above breakage.
IIRC Debian and non-Debian texi2html have a long history of incompatibilities. If the whole Debian world can't convince then to reconcile, we're pretty stuck having to deal with the existing mess by force, hence... > This could also be considered a bug in the > autoconf2.5 package, because it should use "%/bin/texi2html" instead of > a naked "texi2html" (maintainer CCed). dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
