Martin Costabel wrote:
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
[]

I would suspect that libofx has been deprecated in favor of
libofx1--they replace each other anyway (but the shared libraries can
coexist)--and you should just install that


It seems that someone didn't pay attention there. They obsoleted libofx in the 10.3/stable tree, although gnucash still has a BuildDepends on it. I think it is generally a bad idea to remove package descriptions from stable while the package is still in the bindist. And BTW, libofx1 does not exist in 10.3/stable.

 Hopefully fixed now.

I don't have a 10.3 system to check, please let me know if it is still broken.

Thanks,
Peter


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to