On 1/19/07, Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/19/07, Mark Lundquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alexander Hansen wrote: > > > > > > > Yeah, that shouldn't happen. > > > > > > So if you check manually (via "ls", say) you don't have a > > > /sw/lib/perl5/Fink.pm ? > > > > Nope. But: > > > > 1) I *do* have a /sw/lib/perl5; > > > > 2) it *doesn't* contain any Fink.pm... > > > > 3) ...but it *does* contain a Fink/ > > > > 4) ...which contains a bunch of .pm files > > > > 5) (but no Fink.pm) > > > > > > Now what? :-) > > —ml— > > > > > > Try "sudo apt-get install --reinstall fink" >
Hmm--I couldn't reproduce this on my 10.3 setup by just installing perl586 and perl586-core from binaries. Was there some other order of operations that was performed? -- Alexander K. Hansen (akh) Fink Documenter (still) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
