-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
Laine Lee wrote:
> On 11/24/07 3:40 AM, "Martin Costabel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> This is being discussed on another thread, too. I don't see this
>> on two 10.5 machines ppc/intel. It seems to be an interaction
>> with the xml-sax-pm that is coming with the system now, but what
>> is triggering the failure is not clear to me. We'll probably have
>> to wait until more perl gurus are waking up.
>
>
> What do you do if you can install pm588 without any trouble, but
> update-all continues to fail because Fink is still trying to build
> pm586? I already tried selfupdate for Fink. I know this is almost
> surely a beginner's question, but I thought it more appropriate to
> reply to this thread than start a new one. Please pardon me if I'm
> wrong.
>
> Yours 'til I never am,
>
> Laine Lee
>
>
I guess you could remove the -pm586 variant if nothing else on your
system needs it,

- --
Alexander K. Hansen
Fink User Liaison/Documenter
akh AT finkproject DOT org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
iD8DBQFHTEU4B8UpO3rKjQ8RAluVAJwOu8j+25Qq8EsmnQC+Ettistf56gCeJVAl
pQMVFOMqbdNdF/9Ya9uGNH0=
=gHxx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to