On Apr 21, 2008, at 7:52 PM, David Fang wrote:

>>> Somewhat related is that many packages wind up with LaTeX as a  
>>> BuildDepends
>>> for no obvious (to the user) reason. This means lots of extra time  
>>> to install
>>> something, and a sometimes alarmingly large list to install  
>>> something simple
>>> from a fresh Fink.
>>
>> This is a new pet peeve for me, especially when validating packages  
>> from
>> the tracker.  Typically it happens due to a BuildDepend on doxygen,
>> which in turn depends on TeX.  And I don't know how often that is
>> actually necessary:  some packages check for doxygen and graphviz,  
>> but a
>> normal build doesn't _use_ them.
>
> I plead guilty on at least one count.  *ducks*
> Is there a preferred policy of building latex documentation  
> separately?
>

Not as such.  I always figured that maintainers were getting griped at  
by users about it, though.

>> I don't have time just yet, but at some point it might be worth  
>> auditing
>> packages to see how many of these BuildDepends are spurious.
>>
>> Of course, we can't do that when packages use TeX directly to  
>> generate
>> their PDF docs...
>
> I've noticed that texinfo "replaces" tetex-base (<< 3.0).  Does that  
> place it in the same category as tetex and doxygen? (heavy-stuff- 
> used-only-for-compiling-docs)
> or is it lighter-weight than a full tetex install?
>
> (aside: I rather like Texinfo for documenting my own projects...)
>
> Fang
>
> David Fang
> Computer Systems Laboratory
> Electrical & Computer Engineering
> Cornell University
> http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
>       -- (2400 baud? Netscape 3.0?? lynx??? No problem!)

Texinfo is way lighter than tetex.   I think the "replaces" was  
because we had texinfo as part of tetex.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to