Viv Kendon wrote: > Is there a fink version of OOo that compiles/installs on > 10.5? I've tried to compile the ones that are listed, > openoffice.org-firefox and openoffice.org-nocrypto, but both > fail early on (the firefox one fails at the patching phase). > For both I've hit dependency problems, e.g., with > fontconfig2-dev/shlibs which wants system-xfree86 (which no > longer exists). I created local tree copies of the info > files to get round these, but that didn't get me much > further. > > Up until now I've managed to make my 10.4 debs of OOo work > under 10.5. But that was on upgraded finks, not all built > new from scratch against the new X11. Now that I've done a > nice clean build from scratch, things don't work anymore :-| > (essentially because some of the libraries don't match). > > So I'm wondering if folks are just using a different OOo > with 10.5 and not bothering to build it? The thing is, I > want the en-gb localisation, which doesn't seem to be > available as a binary from anywhere that comes up with > google. > > many thanks, > -- Viv > ------------------------------------------------ > Dr Viv Kendon http://quantum.leeds.ac.uk/~viv > Quantum Information Physics & Astronomy > University of Leeds > > I can say that the official upstream binary that I have tried (2.3.0/PowerPC) doesn't work for me. I've been using NeoOffice.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
