I don't know if that will help. I've run into a similar problem on a 10.5-unstable-Intel machine. Basically, I could install clisp 2.46-2, but then Maxima 5.16.3-2 wouldn't install. So, I reverted clisp so that I could have maxima. Recently libsigsegv was upgraded to version 1:2.5-4, and clisp is claiming that it needs 1:2.5-3 in order to install. I seem to be unable to revert libsigsegv so now I'm without either clisp or maxima.
I thought that running fink index -f would help, but it did not. Any help appreciated, Sean On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 3, 2008, at 11:19 AM, Matthew Parry wrote: > >> probably unrelated but i am also having trouble with clisp 2.46 on >> an intel 10.4.11 mpb. >> >> error comes as: >> >> gcc -I/sw/include -Igllib -g -O2 -W -Wswitch -Wcomment -Wpointer-arith >> -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wmissing-declarations -Wno-sign-compare -O2 >> -fexpensive-optimizations -falign-functions=4 -DUNIX_BINARY_DISTRIB >> -DUNICODE -DDYNAMIC_FFI -DNO_READLINE -I. -c spvw.c >> In file included from spvw.d:546: >> spvw_sigsegv.d: In function 'stackoverflow_handler': >> spvw_sigsegv.d:94: error: too few arguments to function >> 'sigsegv_leave_handler' >> make: *** [spvw.o] Error 1 >> ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.1.6IrR6x failed, exit code 2 >> Removing runtime build-lock... >> Removing build-lock package... >> /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-clisp-2.46-1 >> (Reading database ... 91373 files and directories currently >> installed.) >> Removing fink-buildlock-clisp-2.46-1 ... >> Failed: phase compiling: clisp-2.46-1 failed >> >> > > Yeah; this looks like a different issue. But still one that we need > to address. > > This inclines me to think we should mark the current/unstable clisp as > 10.5-only until we get all of the difficulties ironed out. > >> On 3 Oct 2008, at 15:54, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> >>> >>> On Oct 3, 2008, at 10:33 AM, Guy Lauquin wrote: >>> >>>>> >>>>> What sort of PowerPC are you on? I get the same error on a G4; and >>>>> I've noticed issues where sbcl fails on G4 but not G5. >>>> >>>> >>>> I am on a G4. >>>> >>>>> >>> >>> OK--after a bit more digging: I get the same failure for the current >>> clisp on 10.4/G4 but not 10.5/G4 ; I tried 2.45 (from J.F. Mertens) >>> and had the same failure. I'd be interested to know whether this >>> occurs for a G5 on 10.4. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Fink-users mailing list > Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
