On Oct 22, 2008, at 5:41 PM, Ralf Höling wrote: > Hi Martin! > > Am 22.10.2008 um 23:31 schrieb Martin Costabel: >>> >> >> Yes, this looks like mine. It contains a perfectly valid definition >> of http_addrlist_t. The question is if it is really this one that's >> included or a different one with a bad definition. You don't have >> anything cups-related in /usr/local/include? Or in /sw/include/cups/? > > It seems you found it: > % ls -l /sw/include/cups > insgesamt 80 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 6333 23. Okt 2004 cups.h > -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 11398 23. Okt 2004 http.h > -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 7934 23. Okt 2004 image.h > -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 13100 23. Okt 2004 ipp.h > -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 5234 23. Okt 2004 language.h > -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 3044 23. Okt 2004 md5.h > -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 11615 23. Okt 2004 ppd.h > -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 9198 23. Okt 2004 raster.h > > What shall I do? > > Thank you for your help. > > Ralf >
Those look old, but make sure that fink doesn't still have a package associated with them by running dpkg -S /sw/include/cups If no package shows up to claim that directory, then you can probably remove it (or at least rename it). ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users