On Oct 22, 2008, at 5:41 PM, Ralf Höling wrote:

> Hi Martin!
>
> Am 22.10.2008 um 23:31 schrieb Martin Costabel:
>>>
>>
>> Yes, this looks like mine. It contains a perfectly valid definition
>> of http_addrlist_t. The question is if it is really this one that's
>> included or a different one with a bad definition. You don't have
>> anything cups-related in /usr/local/include? Or in /sw/include/cups/?
>
> It seems you found it:
> % ls -l /sw/include/cups
> insgesamt 80
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin  6333 23. Okt 2004  cups.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 11398 23. Okt 2004  http.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin  7934 23. Okt 2004  image.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 13100 23. Okt 2004  ipp.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin  5234 23. Okt 2004  language.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin  3044 23. Okt 2004  md5.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 11615 23. Okt 2004  ppd.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin  9198 23. Okt 2004  raster.h
>
> What shall I do?
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
> Ralf
>


Those look old, but make sure that fink doesn't still have a package  
associated with them by running

dpkg -S /sw/include/cups

If no package shows up to claim that directory, then you can probably  
remove it (or at least rename it).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to