Ben Abbott wrote:
> On Friday, March 27, 2009, at 10:35AM, "Alexander Hansen" 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>   
>> Ben Abbott wrote:
>>     
>>> I tried using the developers version of gnuplot to produce a TikZ  
>>> picture for latex.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I encountered the error below.
>>>
>>>     Undefined control sequence
>>>     \usetikzlibrary {arrows,patterns,plotmarks}
>>>
>>> I have tetex installed via fink, and assume that its tikz.sty is out  
>>> of date.
>>>
>>> Can someone confirm?
>>>
>>> If 'yes', what are my options?
>>>
>>> If 'no', any advice?
>>>
>>> Ben
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> Rather than _assuming_ anything, you can check if tikz.sty even exists
>> on your machine via:
>>
>> dpkg -S tikz.sty
>>
>> -or-
>>
>> dlocate tikz.sty
>>
>> if you have the dlocate package installed (for a faster search).  Doing
>> that, you'll find that there is no such style file in Fink's tetex.
>>
>> The best advice I have for you right now is to install a more modern TeX
>> distro.   I personally use MacTeX (TeXLive), which I did a custom
>> install of to avoid having it install Ghostscript and ImageMagick stuff
>> in /usr/local and thereby confuse my Fink builds.
>>
>>     
>
> I did verify that tikz.sty exists on my system (I should have mentioned that) 
> ... and it appears to have been installed via Fink.
>
> $ dpkg -S tikz.sty
> pgf: /sw/etc/texmf.local/tex/latex/pgf/frontendlayer/tikz.sty
>
> Perhaps this is part of Fink's pgf package?
>
> In any event, I am inclinded to switch to TeXLive. Is there a convenient way 
> to do that without conflicting with the dependencies on tetex? ... or do you 
> imply that MacTeX is intended to co-exist with tetex? 
>
> Ben
>
>
>
> Delivered-To: [email protected]
> Received: by 10.100.254.8 with SMTP id b8cs71741ani;
>         Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: by 10.140.165.17 with SMTP id n17mr245548rve.248.1238169628818;
>         Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
> Return-Path: <[email protected]>
> Received: from asmtpout013.mac.com (asmtpout013.mac.com [17.148.16.88])
>         by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k2si3992842rvb.24.2009.03.27.09.00.28;
>         Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
> Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 
> 17.148.16.88 as permitted sender) client-ip=17.148.16.88;
> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of 
> [email protected] designates 17.148.16.88 as permitted sender) 
> [email protected]
> MIME-version: 1.0
> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
> Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Received: from spool003.mac.com ([10.150.69.53])
>  by asmtp013.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec
>  16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <[email protected]> for
>  [email protected]; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: from webmail022 ([10.13.128.22])
>  by spool003.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec
>  16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <[email protected]>; Fri,
>  27 Mar 2009 09:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
> Return-path: <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:00:24 -0400
> From: Ben Abbott <[email protected]>
> To: Alexander Hansen <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Message-id: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Fink-users] Status of LaTeX?
> Return-path: <[email protected]>
> Received: from [205.160.245.109] from webmail.me.com with HTTP; Fri,
>  27 Mar 2009 12:00:24 -0400
> Received: from [ 67.235.60.12] from webmail.me.com with HTTP; Fri,
>  27 Mar 2009 12:00:24 -0400
> X-Originating-IP: 205.160.245.109, 67.235.60.12
>
>
> On Friday, March 27, 2009, at 10:35AM, "Alexander Hansen" 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>   
>> Ben Abbott wrote:
>>     
>>> I tried using the developers version of gnuplot to produce a TikZ  
>>> picture for latex.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I encountered the error below.
>>>
>>>     Undefined control sequence
>>>     \usetikzlibrary {arrows,patterns,plotmarks}
>>>
>>> I have tetex installed via fink, and assume that its tikz.sty is out  
>>> of date.
>>>
>>> Can someone confirm?
>>>
>>> If 'yes', what are my options?
>>>
>>> If 'no', any advice?
>>>
>>> Ben
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> Rather than _assuming_ anything, you can check if tikz.sty even exists
>> on your machine via:
>>
>> dpkg -S tikz.sty
>>
>> -or-
>>
>> dlocate tikz.sty
>>
>> if you have the dlocate package installed (for a faster search).  Doing
>> that, you'll find that there is no such style file in Fink's tetex.
>>
>> The best advice I have for you right now is to install a more modern TeX
>> distro.   I personally use MacTeX (TeXLive), which I did a custom
>> install of to avoid having it install Ghostscript and ImageMagick stuff
>> in /usr/local and thereby confuse my Fink builds.
>>
>>     
>
> I did verify that tikz.sty exists on my system (I should have mentioned that) 
> ... and it appears to have been installed via Fink.
>
> $ dpkg -S tikz.sty
> pgf: /sw/etc/texmf.local/tex/latex/pgf/frontendlayer/tikz.sty
>
> Perhaps this is part of Fink's pgf package?
>   
Yup, as indicated by the "pgf:" line heading.

So the issue may not be with tetex /per se/, but with pgf instead.  Or
it could be both.
> In any event, I am inclinded to switch to TeXLive. Is there a convenient way 
> to do that without conflicting with the dependencies on tetex? ... or do you 
> imply that MacTeX is intended to co-exist with tetex? 
>
> Ben
>
>
>
>   
You would have to have fink's tetex along for the ride to handle
dependencies.  Others on the list have various hacks to get around this;
but I've not really found the need.    All I do is re-order my PATH so
that TeXLive's executables are at the head; but they're out of the PATH
used in Fink builds.

-- 
Alexander Hansen
Fink User Liaison


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to