On Monday, 29 June 2009 at 14:50, Jean-François Mertens wrote: > > On 26 Jun 2009, at 23:06, Brendan Cully wrote: > > >On Friday, 26 June 2009 at 21:49, Jean-François Mertens wrote: > >> > >>On 26 Jun 2009, at 20:48, Jean-François Mertens wrote: > >> > >>>But then I get another snag, lablgl-related (cf above) this time : > >>>>ocamlmktop -I +lablGL -thread -o lablgtktop unix.cma threads.cma > >>>>lablgl.cma \ > >>>> -I . lablgtk.cma lablgtkgl.cma lablglade.cma > >>>>lablgnomecanvas.cma > >>>>lablgnomeui.cma lablpanel.cma lablrsvg.cma lablgtkspell.cma > >>>>lablgtksourceview.cma gtkThread.cmo > >>>>File "_none_", line 1, characters 0-1: > >>>>Error: The file /sw/lib/ocaml/lablGL/lablgl.cma is not a bytecode > >>>>object file > >> > >>Rebuilding lablgl-x11 solved the problem. > >>Might deps of ocaml have to rebuilt > >>after the recent update ?? > > > >Looks that way, yes. We should probably go with ocaml (=%v) or so. > > including that some deps may have to be updated to a new version. > E.g., with current ocaml one needs %v=5.12 for camlp5 (with previous > ocaml, %v=5.11 was needed; in fink: %v=5.08). > It would be nice if such upgrades were in some way synchronised ..
I agree, but I'm not sure what the right strategy is. What does debian do? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
