On Monday, 29 June 2009 at 14:50, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> 
> On 26 Jun 2009, at 23:06, Brendan Cully wrote:
> 
> >On Friday, 26 June 2009 at 21:49, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> >>
> >>On 26 Jun 2009, at 20:48, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> >>
> >>>But then I get another snag, lablgl-related (cf above) this time :
> >>>>ocamlmktop -I +lablGL -thread  -o lablgtktop unix.cma threads.cma
> >>>>lablgl.cma \
> >>>>     -I . lablgtk.cma lablgtkgl.cma lablglade.cma
> >>>>lablgnomecanvas.cma
> >>>>lablgnomeui.cma lablpanel.cma lablrsvg.cma lablgtkspell.cma
> >>>>lablgtksourceview.cma gtkThread.cmo
> >>>>File "_none_", line 1, characters 0-1:
> >>>>Error: The file /sw/lib/ocaml/lablGL/lablgl.cma is not a bytecode
> >>>>object file
> >>
> >>Rebuilding lablgl-x11 solved the problem.
> >>Might deps of ocaml have to rebuilt
> >>after the recent update ??
> >
> >Looks that way, yes. We should probably go with ocaml (=%v) or so.
> 
> including that some deps may have to be updated to a new version.
> E.g., with current ocaml one needs %v=5.12 for camlp5 (with previous
> ocaml, %v=5.11 was needed; in fink: %v=5.08).
> It would be nice if such upgrades were in some way synchronised ..

I agree, but I'm not sure what the right strategy is. What does debian
do?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to