On 1/17/11 12:17 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote:
>
> On 10.6/x86_64, I get the same failures, but also several more where
> the test expects the value -9223372036854775808 but instead gets
> -'..--).0-*(+,))+(0( ! That looks to me like the result of code that
> isn't 64 bit clean. That isn't too surprising since mysql 5.0.x is
> very old now, originally released in 2005. The current stable version
> is 5.5.8.

I did a quick look at the 5.5.8 source and it uses cmake, and builds 
unversioned dylibs, which would require some patching.  5.1.54 is the 
latest of the 'classic' series (from Nov 2010) and it builds with minor 
changes to the current 5.0.X release in Fink, plus it passed all tests. 
  The biggest change being that libN got bumped and so would require a 
new mysql16 package (and necessary packaging changes).  I can provide a 
copy of this not-ready-for-release mysql16.info file to anyone who wants 
to test it and run with making the new package official.

Hanspeter

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks
Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand 
malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you 
can protect your company and customers by using code signing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to