On 7/29/11 10:27 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 7/29/11 12:33 PM, Richard Miles wrote:
>> On 7/29/11 6:11 AM, Richard Miles wrote:
>>> On 7/29/11 5:55 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>>>> On 7/28/11 12:32 PM, Richard Miles wrote:
>>>>> If I were to erase my 64 bit fink. Then replace it with 32 bit fink
>>>>> would fink commander work with 32 bit fink in /sw?
>>>>>
>>>> It should.  Fink Commander only runs the command-line executables, and
>>>> doesn't really care what architecture you're using.
>>>>
>>> Thanks. I will try that then. Here goes a big change...
>>>
>> after installing fink in /sw and a new finkcommander in /Applications,
>> Fink Commander does not show any packages. This after a selfupdate and
>> update-all. I guess fink commander requires 64 bit fink
>>
>
> Not really.  It was built before 64-bit Fink was even an option.
>
> Try running "update table" from Fink Commander's menu.
I tried that, but the table remains blank 0 packages installed.
I ran seftupdate from a terminal and it listed packages. I installed 
bundle-gnome. Many packages were installed.
But FinkCommander shows a blank table. I don't understand why it does 
not list packages. ?


-- 
Richard Miles


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got Input?   Slashdot Needs You.
Take our quick survey online.  Come on, we don't ask for help often.
Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to