Hi!

tetex-base fails to compile on 10.5 and i386 every time I try to compile it:

===

building package tetex-base.

fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. The
candidates:

(1)     ghostscript: Interpreter for PostScript and PDF
(2)     ghostscript-esp: Ghostscript with better CJK and cups support
(3)     ghostscript6: Interpreter for PostScript and PDF, v6.01

Pick one: [1] (assuming default)
The following package will be installed or updated:
 tetex-base
The following 2 additional packages will be installed:
 ghostscript tetex-texmf
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] (assuming default)
Reading buildlock packages...
/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -i
/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/text/ghostscript_9.02-3_darwin-i386.deb
Selecting previously deselected package ghostscript.
(Reading database ... 106340 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking ghostscript (from .../ghostscript_9.02-3_darwin-i386.deb) ...
Setting up ghostscript (9.02-3) ...

Reading buildlock packages...
Could not resolve inconsistent dependencies!

Fink isn't sure how to install the above packages safely. You may be able to
fix things by running:

  fink scanpackages
  sudo apt-get update
  sudo apt-get install tetex-texmf=3.0-2

Failed: Fink::SysState: Could not resolve inconsistent dependencies

===

Any thoughts what's wrong?


Mitar

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop 
What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
from deploying virtual desktops?   How do next-generation virtual desktops
provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable
virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to