On 4/25/2012 3:08 PM, Jorge Acereda wrote: > > On Apr 25, 2012, at 8:09 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: >> >> It seems that Fink's ffcall (which is also the latest upstream release) does >> not work in x86_64. >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg31434.html >> >> For some reason it was never marked as ppc/i386 only. Jorge, I'll mark it as >> such in a day or two unless we hear otherwise. elcepi, the same goes for >> your package clisp since it depends on ffcall. > > Ok, thanks. I don't have a repository at hand to do that. > > In any case, clisp should probably consider an alternative FFI implementation > based on libffi. ffcall is messy to say it politely. > At some point I started porting it to x64 and got something running, but some > tests failed. I ended up switching my project to use libffi. > I've been trying to find the sources, no luck.
ffcall, clips, and gforth have now been marked as i386/ppc only. I've also filed a bug upstream about the x86_64 build failure: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?36323 Hanspeter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
