On 6/18/13 6:52 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > On 6/18/2013 9:42 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: >> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:00:03 -0700, Alexander Hansen >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 6/18/13 11:10 AM, Anderson Mesquita wrote: >>>> I just noticed BitchX is not available yet on 10.7 and up. Does anybody >>>> know if there's any plans for that in the near future? >>>> I tried just grabbing the 10.4 release and compiling it, but that >>>> doesn't work! >>>> >>>> http://pastebin.com/QG7tJGAm >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Anderson Mesquita >>>> >>>> >>> >>> We're not regimented enough to have plans on non-base packages. :-) >>> Standard practice has been for the maintainer or other folks to try >>> the current or a new version. >> >> I get the same results on 10.8. The code is many years old and the >> upstream project appears to be dead: there is a slightly newer version >> available (1.1 from ~9 years ago), the release for which 1.0c19 is the >> development leadup, and it also fails the same way. Maybe some other >> developer has picked it up and now hosts it at some other site? > > According to Wikipedia, bitchx.com was hijacked and the proper site is > bitchx.ca. Don't know how trustworthy that information is, however. > Neither Debian nor Ubuntu carry bitchx, but Fedora seems to have 1.2.1, > fwiw. > > Hanspeter >
https://github.com/BitchX/BitchX1.2/wiki seems consistent with that. -- Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. Fink User Liaison My package updates: http://finkakh.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
