Am 23.11.2013 um 19:48 schrieb Jonas S:
> I hope I do not misunderstand you, but I do not quite agree with this.
You did. What was wrong in using an example? And thinking over your finding of
"/sw/share/tlpkg"?
>
> I am not convinced that it is a good idea to remove tlmgr, as Martin Costabel
> suggests, I’ve never used tlmgr as it is non-functional but unless it is
> broken beyond repair it should IMHO be repaired. If it is the recommended way
> of adding new packages to the TeX installation? Is it deprecated and another
> packaging system is taking over?
In Fink it's the maintainer(s) of a package who update the package.
>
> I know of no other texmf.cnf file on my computer
That's OK. You just have to create another texmf.cnf file. That's what for
example the MacTeX package performs. And I too, in order to get
TEXMFHOME = ~/Library/texmf
and some more.
>
> I think that a operational tlmgr should be possible
Yes, but it won't be wise. There can only be one package manager. (For Linux
wrapper packages exist that link sections of a TeX Live installation into the
system's package manager to satisfy particular TeX related dependencies.)
--
Greetings
Pete
A blizzard is when it snows sideways.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing
conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
