On Sun, 06 Apr 2014 21:20:54 -0700, Alexander Hansen 
<alexanderk.han...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/6/14, 8:55 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> > On Sun, 06 Apr 2014 14:14:42 -0600, "Gary K. Olson"
> > <garykol...@mac.com> wrote:
> >>        On 4/5/14, 12:09 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Googling for this sort of compatiblity problem (I don't actually know
> >>> anything about this specific situation) suggests the portable solution
> >>> is to use boost. And gelemental itself seems like a dead upstream. 
> >>>
> >> If elemental is dead upstream, maybe our efforts would be better
> >> spent on other issues.  Chalk one more up to Apple destroying part
> >> of X11 and gcc in their efforts to make the Mac more secure. 
> >
> > Does gperiodic build for you? It seems to fill the same niche. 
>
> gperiodic works for me on 10.9/Xcode 5.1 using fink-0.36.4--and it 
> doesn't seem to throw any warnings about unused compiler flags. 

I tagged gelemental 10.[78]-only

dan

  --
Daniel Macks
dma...@netspace.org



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Put Bad Developers to Shame
Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration
Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment 
Start a new project now. Try Jenkins in the cloud.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13600_Cloudbees_APR
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to