Re: FIO - Client and Server - Suggestion

[Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues]

> On Oct 12, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk> wrote:
> 
>> On 2014-10-12 14:28, Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>>> On Oct 12, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 2014-10-12 13:12, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>> On 2014-10-12 09:26, Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues wrote:
>>>>> Just applied the patch and it's perfect.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please see below:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Nossa Senhora:fiop neto$ ./fio --client 10.61.109.151 --remote-config
>>>>> /root/fiop/iotest --client 10.61.109.152 --remote-config /root/fio/iotest
>>>>> hostname=s2, be=0, 64-bit, os=Linux, arch=x86-64,
>>>>> fio=fio-2.1.13-59-gaa7bc, flags=1
>>>>> hostname=s1, be=0, 64-bit, os=Linux, arch=x86-64,
>>>>> fio=fio-2.1.13-59-gaa7bc, flags=1
>>>>> <s2> fio: unable to open '/root/fio/iotest' job file
>>>>> <s1> workload: (g=0): rw=write, bs=32K-32K/32K-32K/32K-32K,
>>>>> ioengine=libaio, iodepth=4
>>>>> <s1> ...
>>>>> <s1> Starting 64 threads
>>>>> Jobs: 64 (f=1024): [W(64)] [43.3% done] [882.5M/0K/0K /s] [27.6K/0/0
>>>>> iops]
>>>>> [eta 00m:34s]
>>>> 
>>>> Great, at least that took care of that issue. As to missing output from
>>>> one client, I've seen that here before, I will look into that. It's a
>>>> separate issue.
>>> 
>>> For the above one, s2 never started since it could not find the config file 
>>> you gave it. Have you seen missing final output for cases where the jobs 
>>> did all start? This particular one does not look valid.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Jens Axboe
>> 
>> 
>> Yes. I did.
>> 
>> I ran using both servers but the output was showing the latest client - s2
> 
> Odd. Can you reproduce and send the output of such a run?
> 
> -- 
> Jens Axboe
> 

Yes, tomorrow morning I will send it over.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html