The following changes since commit 669e8bf8d509458aa6b3978b9e8a2e3d666e892d:
server: make the setsockopt() error output a bit more informative (2015-07-29
09:00:03 -0600)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.dk/fio.git master
for you to fetch changes up to 92060d6c59f1848e86cd9ddd7550907c79bda3d5:
arch-ppc.h: Add ilog2 implementation for ppc64 (2015-08-13 12:45:20 -0600)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Chandan Rajendra (1):
arch-ppc.h: Add ilog2 implementation for ppc64
DaveGlen (2):
Implement new Rate Control
initialize rate_io_issue_bytes
Jens Axboe (1):
Whitespace fixup
arch/arch-ppc.h | 12 ++++++++---
backend.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
fio.h | 3 ++-
init.c | 3 ++-
io_u.c | 67 +++++++++++++++------------------------------------------
ioengines.c | 2 ++
libfio.c | 2 ++
workqueue.c | 1 +
8 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
---
Diff of recent changes:
diff --git a/arch/arch-ppc.h b/arch/arch-ppc.h
index d4a080c..aed41f9 100644
--- a/arch/arch-ppc.h
+++ b/arch/arch-ppc.h
@@ -33,18 +33,24 @@
#define write_barrier() __asm__ __volatile__ ("sync" : : : "memory")
+#ifdef __powerpc64__
+#define PPC_CNTLZL "cntlzd"
+#else
+#define PPC_CNTLZL "cntlzw"
+#endif
+
static inline int __ilog2(unsigned long bitmask)
{
int lz;
- asm ("cntlzw %0,%1" : "=r" (lz) : "r" (bitmask));
- return 31 - lz;
+ asm (PPC_CNTLZL " %0,%1" : "=r" (lz) : "r" (bitmask));
+ return BITS_PER_LONG - 1 - lz;
}
static inline int arch_ffz(unsigned long bitmask)
{
if ((bitmask = ~bitmask) == 0)
- return 32;
+ return BITS_PER_LONG;
return __ilog2(bitmask & -bitmask);
}
diff --git a/backend.c b/backend.c
index 3eafff6..9307667 100644
--- a/backend.c
+++ b/backend.c
@@ -763,6 +763,25 @@ static int io_complete_bytes_exceeded(struct thread_data
*td)
}
/*
+ * used to calculate the next io time for rate control
+ *
+ */
+static long long usec_for_io(struct thread_data *td, enum fio_ddir ddir)
+{
+ uint64_t secs, remainder, bps, bytes;
+
+ assert(!(td->flags & TD_F_CHILD));
+ bytes = td->rate_io_issue_bytes[ddir];
+ bps = td->rate_bps[ddir];
+ if (bps) {
+ secs = bytes / bps;
+ remainder = bytes % bps;
+ return remainder * 1000000 / bps + secs * 1000000;
+ } else
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
* Main IO worker function. It retrieves io_u's to process and queues
* and reaps them, checking for rate and errors along the way.
*
@@ -891,9 +910,16 @@ static uint64_t do_io(struct thread_data *td)
if (td->error)
break;
ret = workqueue_enqueue(&td->io_wq, io_u);
+
+ if (should_check_rate(td))
+ td->rate_next_io_time[ddir] = usec_for_io(td,
ddir);
+
} else {
ret = td_io_queue(td, io_u);
+ if (should_check_rate(td))
+ td->rate_next_io_time[ddir] = usec_for_io(td,
ddir);
+
if (io_queue_event(td, io_u, &ret, ddir, &bytes_issued,
0, &comp_time))
break;
diff --git a/fio.h b/fio.h
index 81d58e8..17bc02b 100644
--- a/fio.h
+++ b/fio.h
@@ -238,9 +238,10 @@ struct thread_data {
* Rate state
*/
uint64_t rate_bps[DDIR_RWDIR_CNT];
- long rate_pending_usleep[DDIR_RWDIR_CNT];
+ unsigned long rate_next_io_time[DDIR_RWDIR_CNT];
unsigned long rate_bytes[DDIR_RWDIR_CNT];
unsigned long rate_blocks[DDIR_RWDIR_CNT];
+ unsigned long rate_io_issue_bytes[DDIR_RWDIR_CNT];
struct timeval lastrate[DDIR_RWDIR_CNT];
/*
diff --git a/init.c b/init.c
index 5edd53e..8e1f295 100644
--- a/init.c
+++ b/init.c
@@ -465,7 +465,8 @@ static int __setup_rate(struct thread_data *td, enum
fio_ddir ddir)
return -1;
}
- td->rate_pending_usleep[ddir] = 0;
+ td->rate_next_io_time[ddir] = 0;
+ td->rate_io_issue_bytes[ddir] = 0;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/io_u.c b/io_u.c
index d80ef98..9f10206 100644
--- a/io_u.c
+++ b/io_u.c
@@ -568,49 +568,47 @@ void io_u_quiesce(struct thread_data *td)
static enum fio_ddir rate_ddir(struct thread_data *td, enum fio_ddir ddir)
{
enum fio_ddir odir = ddir ^ 1;
- long usec;
+ long usec, now;
assert(ddir_rw(ddir));
+ now = utime_since_now(&td->start);
- if (td->rate_pending_usleep[ddir] <= 0)
+ /*
+ * if rate_next_io_time is in the past, need to catch up to rate
+ */
+ if (td->rate_next_io_time[ddir] <= now)
return ddir;
/*
- * We have too much pending sleep in this direction. See if we
+ * We are ahead of rate in this direction. See if we
* should switch.
*/
if (td_rw(td) && td->o.rwmix[odir]) {
/*
- * Other direction does not have too much pending, switch
+ * Other direction is behind rate, switch
*/
- if (td->rate_pending_usleep[odir] < 100000)
+ if (td->rate_next_io_time[odir] <= now)
return odir;
/*
- * Both directions have pending sleep. Sleep the minimum time
- * and deduct from both.
+ * Both directions are ahead of rate. sleep the min
+ * switch if necissary
*/
- if (td->rate_pending_usleep[ddir] <=
- td->rate_pending_usleep[odir]) {
- usec = td->rate_pending_usleep[ddir];
+ if (td->rate_next_io_time[ddir] <=
+ td->rate_next_io_time[odir]) {
+ usec = td->rate_next_io_time[ddir] - now;
} else {
- usec = td->rate_pending_usleep[odir];
+ usec = td->rate_next_io_time[odir] - now;
ddir = odir;
}
} else
- usec = td->rate_pending_usleep[ddir];
+ usec = td->rate_next_io_time[ddir] - now;
if (td->o.io_submit_mode == IO_MODE_INLINE)
io_u_quiesce(td);
usec = usec_sleep(td, usec);
- td->rate_pending_usleep[ddir] -= usec;
-
- odir = ddir ^ 1;
- if (td_rw(td) && __should_check_rate(td, odir))
- td->rate_pending_usleep[odir] -= usec;
-
return ddir;
}
@@ -1656,18 +1654,6 @@ static void account_io_completion(struct thread_data
*td, struct io_u *io_u,
}
}
-static long long usec_for_io(struct thread_data *td, enum fio_ddir ddir)
-{
- uint64_t secs, remainder, bps, bytes;
-
- assert(!(td->flags & TD_F_CHILD));
- bytes = td->this_io_bytes[ddir];
- bps = td->rate_bps[ddir];
- secs = bytes / bps;
- remainder = bytes % bps;
- return remainder * 1000000 / bps + secs * 1000000;
-}
-
static void io_completed(struct thread_data *td, struct io_u **io_u_ptr,
struct io_completion_data *icd)
{
@@ -1709,7 +1695,6 @@ static void io_completed(struct thread_data *td, struct
io_u **io_u_ptr,
if (!io_u->error && ddir_rw(ddir)) {
unsigned int bytes = io_u->buflen - io_u->resid;
- const enum fio_ddir oddir = ddir ^ 1;
int ret;
td->io_blocks[ddir]++;
@@ -1738,27 +1723,9 @@ static void io_completed(struct thread_data *td, struct
io_u **io_u_ptr,
}
if (ramp_time_over(td) && (td->runstate == TD_RUNNING ||
- td->runstate == TD_VERIFYING)) {
- struct thread_data *__td = td;
-
+ td->runstate == TD_VERIFYING))
account_io_completion(td, io_u, icd, ddir, bytes);
- if (td->parent)
- __td = td->parent;
-
- if (__should_check_rate(__td, ddir)) {
- __td->rate_pending_usleep[ddir] =
- (usec_for_io(__td, ddir) -
- utime_since_now(&__td->start));
- }
- if (ddir != DDIR_TRIM &&
- __should_check_rate(__td, oddir)) {
- __td->rate_pending_usleep[oddir] =
- (usec_for_io(__td, oddir) -
- utime_since_now(&__td->start));
- }
- }
-
icd->bytes_done[ddir] += bytes;
if (io_u->end_io) {
diff --git a/ioengines.c b/ioengines.c
index 958731d..9c5ac60 100644
--- a/ioengines.c
+++ b/ioengines.c
@@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ int td_io_queue(struct thread_data *td, struct io_u *io_u)
if (ddir_rw(ddir)) {
td->io_issues[ddir]++;
td->io_issue_bytes[ddir] += buflen;
+ td->rate_io_issue_bytes[ddir] += buflen;
}
ret = td->io_ops->queue(td, io_u);
@@ -308,6 +309,7 @@ int td_io_queue(struct thread_data *td, struct io_u *io_u)
if (ret == FIO_Q_BUSY && ddir_rw(ddir)) {
td->io_issues[ddir]--;
td->io_issue_bytes[ddir] -= buflen;
+ td->rate_io_issue_bytes[ddir] -= buflen;
}
/*
diff --git a/libfio.c b/libfio.c
index b0141a7..d4cad3e 100644
--- a/libfio.c
+++ b/libfio.c
@@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ static void reset_io_counters(struct thread_data *td)
td->rate_bytes[ddir] = 0;
td->rate_blocks[ddir] = 0;
td->bytes_done[ddir] = 0;
+ td->rate_io_issue_bytes[ddir] = 0;
+ td->rate_next_io_time[ddir] = 0;
}
td->zone_bytes = 0;
diff --git a/workqueue.c b/workqueue.c
index 0a6cd20..e236516 100644
--- a/workqueue.c
+++ b/workqueue.c
@@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ int workqueue_enqueue(struct workqueue *wq, struct io_u
*io_u)
if (ddir_rw(ddir)) {
parent->io_issues[ddir]++;
parent->io_issue_bytes[ddir] += io_u->xfer_buflen;
+ parent->rate_io_issue_bytes[ddir] += io_u->xfer_buflen;
}
pthread_mutex_lock(&sw->lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
