As a follow-up question: I could simulate my system using a triangular mesh this way. Is there a problem doing so ?
Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 10:02:20 UTC+2, Henri Colaux a écrit : > As advised by Jonathan Guyer, I added an issue to GitHub: > https://github.com/usnistgov/fipy/issues/819 > > Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 09:49:47 UTC+2, Henri Colaux a écrit : > >> >> Dear Fipy users, >> >> I would like to draw your attention on the question I asked on >> stackoverflow : >> >> >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69196642/define-a-non-cartesian-mesh-in-fipy >> >> I am trying to simulate the elementary unit of a 2D system that have a >> P6mm symmetry in fipy and I would like to define a non-cartesian mesh that >> describes the system described below. Yet, >> mesh = fipy.Grid2D(nx = 10, ny = 10, dx = 1., dy = 1.) >> >> only returns uniform meshes. I thought of changing the FaceVariable, but >> it seems it only accepts Boolean variables. I could also simulate a >> cartesian system equivalent to this one, but there would be redondant data. >> Would someone have a better approach? >> >> You can see the picture on the stackoverflow question. >> Cheers, >> >> Henri Colaux >> > -- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] View this message at https://list.nist.gov/fipy --- To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
