My apologies for the spam. I did not realize that it was not possible to include pictures. I added the schematic in the stackoverflow question. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69196642/define-a-non-cartesian-mesh-in-fipy
Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 10:58:54 UTC+2, Henri Colaux a écrit : > > > Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 10:58:20 UTC+2, Henri Colaux a écrit : > >> As a follow-up question: I could simulate my system using a triangular >> mesh this way. Is there a problem doing so ? >> >> >> Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 10:02:20 UTC+2, Henri Colaux a écrit : >> >>> As advised by Jonathan Guyer, I added an issue to GitHub: >>> https://github.com/usnistgov/fipy/issues/819 >>> >>> Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 09:49:47 UTC+2, Henri Colaux a écrit : >>> >>>> >>>> Dear Fipy users, >>>> >>>> I would like to draw your attention on the question I asked on >>>> stackoverflow : >>>> >>>> >>>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69196642/define-a-non-cartesian-mesh-in-fipy >>>> >>>> I am trying to simulate the elementary unit of a 2D system that have a >>>> P6mm symmetry in fipy and I would like to define a non-cartesian mesh that >>>> describes the system described below. Yet, >>>> mesh = fipy.Grid2D(nx = 10, ny = 10, dx = 1., dy = 1.) >>>> >>>> only returns uniform meshes. I thought of changing the FaceVariable, >>>> but it seems it only accepts Boolean variables. I could also simulate a >>>> cartesian system equivalent to this one, but there would be redondant >>>> data. >>>> Would someone have a better approach? >>>> >>>> You can see the picture on the stackoverflow question. >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Henri Colaux >>>> >>> -- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] View this message at https://list.nist.gov/fipy --- To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
