On Jan 8, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Etienne Rivard wrote:
Hello Jonathan, Once again, thank you for your answer.
I'm glad to help... if you can call it that
How does $v^*$ appear in your other equations? Is it possible that oneof them is more naturally solved for velocity?I definitely don't think so. The other equations, in cartesian coordinatesand without coordinate change have the following form \[ \frac{\partial}{\partial t} (cx) + \nabla \cdot (cv^*x) = \nabla \cdot (c D \nabla x) \] and they are necessary to calculate $x$, the mole fraction. The legend has it that the velocity must be calculated from continuity
I want to reiterate that fluids aren't my thing, but perhaps my naiveté can be of some benefit.
Do you not have a momentum equation? In Daniel's work, I believe he solves the momentum equation for velocity. Something like
\[
\frac{\partial}{\partial t} (cv^*)
+ \nabla\cdot (c v^* v^*)
+ dissipation terms
= 0
\]
But last night, I reread a thesis I have and I realized that the convection can be neglected. Which of course solves the problem withvelocity. I will go with this approach now because I need results for aconference in early spring and I'm confident it will give satisfactory results.
That sounds like it may be the most expedient solution. Good luck.
