On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Michael Brown <[email protected] > wrote:
> I don't think you need to split between the x and u parts of f as long as >> you can construct a g such that g_x = f. g can be arbitrary. >> >> > > Okay, but the problem is f depends on u, so to solve g_x = f(u(x, t), x) I > need to know u, the unknown! > You're quite right! What I said doesn't make any sense. As you say, the right way is to split it an integrate in time, which seems reasonable. It remains local that way. -- Daniel Wheeler
_______________________________________________ fipy mailing list [email protected] http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
