On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Fausto Arinos de A. Barbuto < [email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Daniel, > > More and more I like this neat piece of software called FiPy but less and > less I understand > it. :-) I moved on to Example 5.1-ii (where the Péclet is > 2 and therefore > numerical > instabilities should pop up) but FiPy simply gave rat's ass to this all > and came up with > the most precise, almost-analytical solution I have ever seen for that > example. > With the power law convection scheme, it should be stable (and first order accurate) through the whole range of Peclet numbers. Which convection scheme are you using? > I apologize for flooding the list with such simple questions and examples, > but before the > more complex CFD configurations come the simple ones. Soon I will be > tackling transient > and 2D problems, once again following V&M's tracks. > It's cool. All feedback is welcome. > I didn't know that there were a wiki where I might publish my findings. > That's (good) news > to me. > I just noticed that you can't create a wiki or blog post at the moment. I'll try and fix that. -- Daniel Wheeler
_______________________________________________ fipy mailing list [email protected] http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
