On 4 December 2012 18:56, Daniel Wheeler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Tanya Gornak <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> No, this would not work for me. I need Cartesian mesh, because I want >> to test new method for solving pressure correction equation, >> and it works only on Cartesian mesh. >> > > Tanya, It might be better to use one of the standard grid classes and then > use source terms to blank out exterior cells. Seems much easier to me at > least to get something working. Worry about optimizing it later.
Thanks, Daniel. Your idea is great and I've already done something like this. But in current simulation I definitely need curved boundary with Neumann boundary condition on faces. I think that I shall use Benny's idea and create my own mesh class. Thanks all for helping. > > Cheers > > -- > Daniel Wheeler > > _______________________________________________ > fipy mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy > [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ] > -- Sincerely yours, Tatiana Gornak _______________________________________________ fipy mailing list [email protected] http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
