|
Altan,
There seem to be some problems with the final loop's indentation: for i in range(10): # move forward in time by one time step psi.updateOld() # sweep until you get the desired residue res = 100. while res > 0.001: res = eqn.sweep(dt=dt, solver=GeneralSolver(iterations=20, tolerance=1e-5)) print res vi1.plot() It seems like the plot() call has an extra indent that it shouldn't which for some reason is being treated as if it's part of the sweep loop rather than just causing an error. It also shouldn't be printing more than 10 res values unless 'print res' is part of the sweep loop. If I do this: while res > 0.001: res = eqn.sweep(dt=dt, solver=GeneralSolver(iterations=20, tolerance=1e-5)) vi1.plot() print i, res the plot shows the same divergence happening at the corners, but only this is printed: 0 0.000944978555 1 0.000885568500159 So your original code is actually behaving like this: while res > 0.001: res = eqn.sweep(dt=dt, solver=GeneralSolver(iterations=20, tolerance=1e-5)) print i, res vi1.plot() I don't quite understand why, but in any case it seems like what you want is: while res > 0.001: res = eqn.sweep(dt=dt, solver=GeneralSolver(iterations=20, tolerance=1e-5)) print i, res vi1.plot() This no longer shows the divergent behavior in the plot, but doesn't address the bigger problem that it's diverging on the third timestep. I believe this is related to your mesh. I don't understand what exactly the + [[-xmax],[-xmax]] term is doing, because if I do 'print mesh' I get 'UniformGrid2D(dx=0.2, nx=45, dy=0.2, ny=45)' whether or not this last term is commented out. I infer that this syntax is meant to mirror the +XY quadrant into the other 3 quadrants without having to solve redundant cells in a 4x larger grid. But if I run the code with this term commented out, the 10 steps are able to complete without divergence, so somehow this term is causing the solution to diverge. The image in the plot doesn't appear to change after 10 steps, but if I go to 100 steps, I get this: ![]() So something is indeed happening now, and without divergence, but it's not the expected behavior. Maybe someone else can see where to go next with this. Adam On 12/06/2012 09:42 PM, Allawala, Altan wrote: Hello, |
_______________________________________________ fipy mailing list [email protected] http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]

