Great. I find that what I suggested is consistent with http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy/documentation/numerical/discret.html#linear-equations and with eq. 1 in "numerical schemes".
On 10 July 2013 22:45, Jonathan Guyer <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 3:14 PM, Noam Yorav-Raphael <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > In the "numerical schemes" page, in the first paragraph: > > > > aA-Ff>0 should be aA+Ff>0 > > Pf=-Ff/Df should be Pf=Ff/Df > > > > At least that's what makes sense to me. > > I'll let Wheeler address that. I know we had some sign changes in how we > documented convection. Maybe that didn't propagate everywhere it needed to > go. > > > I really tried to file a ticket, with no success. Perhaps, if you want > to encourage contributions, you can consider to migrate to github - the > trac interface is really confusing. > > The trac interface is broken. Supposedly it's being worked on. A migration > to github is one option we are considering. > > I've created an account for you. I'll email the details offline. > _______________________________________________ > fipy mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy > [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ] >
_______________________________________________ fipy mailing list [email protected] http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
