On Jul 18, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Edwin Sze Lun Khoo <[email protected]> wrote:
> I ran the code using 3 different methods: > • Without [] and with printing cL.faceGrad[0][0] > • With [] and without printing cL.faceGrad[0][0] > • With the mesh._orientedFaceNormals method you proposed and without > printing cL.faceGrad[0][0] > I just printed and manually checked the values of cL.faceValue[0], > Kr/D*cL.faceValue[0]**2 and Flux/D for all 3 cases for all times and found > them to be the same in all 3 cases. This doesn't explain why [] works, but at > least it shows all 3 ways are equivalent. I stand corrected. That's what I get for eye-balling it. _______________________________________________ fipy mailing list [email protected] http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
