Hmm... The plot thickens... Anyway, thanks for the help!
Charles On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Daniel Wheeler <[email protected]>wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Charles Reid <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Ah! This makes a lot more sense now. With your explanation and the > document, > > it makes sense - particularly, thinking about the transient term as a > source > > term instead of a transient term. Thanks for sending the link; the > document > > is very clear and thorough. > > Excellent. Glad that it helped. > > > I also saw several references to Harry Moffat's work - I know of Harry's > > work through my use of Cantera, for which Harry is a primary developer. > His > > approach is (presumably) the same as, or similar to, what's in Cantera, > > which is the tool I'm currently using to solve coverage equations for > > catalysts. So making that connection was very helpful too! > > Harry Moffat? Maybe the wrong Moffat. I coauthor papers with someone > called Tom Moffat. No connection with Harry. > > -- > Daniel Wheeler > _______________________________________________ > fipy mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy > [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ] >
_______________________________________________ fipy mailing list [email protected] http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
