{#} Replies are directed back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{#} To reply to the author, write to David Remahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Yeah, i think that blue oval looks really ugly. so much so that i turn that
>> option off so i don't have to look at it. it doesn't match the design, and
>> it
>> looks pretty funny..
>
> Don't you mean you never turn it on in the first place?
>
>> no biggie though i suppose.. .29b is awesome!
>
> Thanks.
>
>> (but hey look at it this way.. you know you're closer to 1.0 when the
>> feature requests get more detailed;)
>
> :)
>
> On Sunday, January 20, 2002, at 11:06 AM, David Remahl wrote:
>
>> [While on the topic of badges]. Although I like the idea of the
>> number-of-users badge, I don't particularly like the way it looks. I had an
>> idea to replace the blue oval with a blue flame bitmap. I'm not sufficiently
>> graphically inclined, but if someone else could make the image, I could
>> implement it and we could see if we like it.
>
> The oval resizes itself based on the number of digits it needs to
> accommodate. In order to achieve the same functionality with a background
> image, you'll need three images -- left, center, and right. Do we want to
> go through that complexity, or just allow the user to choose the color of
> the dot?
I think that the risk of someone having a quad-digit number of users online
at the same time is quite low, so three different flames would be enough.
Or: the one flame could be stretched horizontally to accommodate different
width numbers...Personally I think that color control isn't enough...
/ david
{#} ----------------------------------------------------+[ fire ]+---
