|
Steve Russell wrote:
"If this was in the US, the Second Amendment would be irrelevant. The
argument would be that if a right was not given up in a treaty, it still
exists."
The above sounds like the Federalist argument
that the entire Bill of Rights was irrelevant, because if a power was not
specifically "given up" to Congress, it was assumed not to
be exercisable by Congress.
You remember what they say about making
assumptions . . . .
J.N. Heath
|
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof
