actually, you did not get to buy alcohol at 18 because you were a NY citizen. As eery kid in Conn. knew, they too could buy liquor in NY at 18; it was not an issue of citizenship, but rather of local law. ANYONE -- even a visitor from France or Russia could buy booze in NY at 18. Lots of laws are local; age of consent in this country runs form 15 to 18. A 21 year old can have sex with his 16 year old girlfriend in one state and be ok, but if they are on vacation in aother state, he could be busted for statutory rape. Guns, sex, booze, all subject to local regulation. Even the age at which you can drive. Or who you can marry!

Paul Finkelman

Henry Schaffer wrote:
Greg writes:

...
"Getting to Section 2, we find the citizens of each state being entitled to the "privileges and immunities" of the several states. Whatever that or they might be, which is a matter of great interest to this discussion."


"The licenses in question are, most assuredly, a privilege granted by each state, so why are they not automatically recognized by the several states without additional agreements or statutes? Simple. They are not privileges of the citizens of any state that come to the person automatically by way of the citizenship. Put another way, citizenship does not grant the privilege. Therefore, since tests are required, or other formalities, the automatics of the P&I clause of Article IV, Section 2, do not apply."


  When I was 18 years old, I lived in New York State - and had the
privilege of buying alcoholic beverages - which came to all New York
State residents automatically by way of citizenship in the State.

  Connecticut did not recognize this privelege when I travelled into
Connecticut.

  Would Article IV, Section2 require them to?

  While (I think that) alcoholic beverage age requirement are uniform
now and so there is no such dispute possible, firearms ownership
(without a license) doesn't seem to be uniform.

  In my state (NC) any citizen can purchase and posess "regular" (not
full-auto, not AOW, ...) long arms with no state license or permit.
This seems to fit the "automatically by way of citizenship in the State"
test.  Yet there are some states which will not honor this posession -
I'm thinking particularly of the states with have special laws regarding
classes of long arms which they label, e.g. "assault weapons".

So does the Sect 2 compel these states to allow a NC citizen to
posess such a long arm? Or does the "automatically" perhaps not apply
because NC has a few exceptions to automatically (e.g. convicted felon)?


--henry schaffer
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof


--
Paul Finkelman
Chapman Distinguished Professor
University of Tulsa College of Law
3120 East 4th Place
Tulsa, Oklahoma  74104-2499

918-631-3706 (office)
918-631-2194 (fax)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Reply via email to