I'm not convinced on this approach.
That makes two of us. I presented it as a possibility.
Let's assume for the moment the destination is not a workplace, but another person's home. Is the right of this homeowner secondary?
Never.
If Maggie doesn't like guns, and doesn't want John to bring his gun onto her property, she can keep him from doing so. Ignoring for the moment the lacking of individual standing that a
corporation has, why would their property rights have a secondary status?
I created the argument that I submitted more for the sake of discussion than anything else - I didn't say I really liked it. :-D
***GRJ***
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
