one wonders why the 'acceptance-of-the-right-but-subject-to-regulation'
scholar doesn't immediately call for such an intellectual discussion, rather
than morosely wait behind collectivist blather to perhaps distract and
weaken the resolve of those who not only engage in but verily breathe an
'activity'. one assumes they have had plenty of time, and are less than
impressed with the agenda to which they now default.
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 3:02 PM
...snip
This weighing of the pluses and minuses of an activity and determining an
appropriate level of regulation is a legitimate role for government. Gun
control is no exception.
---Robert J. Spitzer
Cortland, N.Y., Jan. 16, 2007
The writer, a professor of political science at SUNY
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the
messages to others.
