Minnesota prohibits the "posting" of any parking lot. All the business lobbying groups supported that in return for clear authority to prohibit otherwise lawful carry by employees while "in the course and scope of employment." As I told one Chamber of Commerce representative during the debates, "Your workers are employees, not serfs. Their home, their car, and their lives are theirs." See Minn. Stat. sec. 624.714, subd. 18. Professor Joseph Olson, J.D., LL.M. o- 651-523-2142 Hamline University School of Law f- 651-523-2236 St. Paul, MN 55113-1235 c- 612-865-7956 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> "Volokh, Eugene" [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/22/07 1:51 PM >> ( mailto:[EMAIL >>> PROTECTED]/22/07%201:51%20PM%20%3E%3E ) [Eugene Volokh, February 22, 2007 at 2:45pm ( http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_02_18-2007_02_24.shtml#1172173543 )] Trackbacks ( http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&url=http%3a%2f%2fvolokh.com%2farchives%2farchive_2007_02_18%2d2007_02_24.shtml%231172173543 ) Employee Gun Possession (Outside Employer Property) Presumptively Protected Against Employer Retaliation?
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
