[b]It's About The Second Amendment And Nothing Else[/b]
 
By MARION P. HAMMER
The Tampa Tribune
Published: April 25, 2008
 
While clowning around with my grandchildren one day, I suddenly shouted, "Look 
at the sky, it has turned from blue to green."
 
Try as I might, I could never convince them that it was true, because they 
could see and couldn't be fooled. So it is with Robert Levy's column 
("Employers Must Pull The Trigger," Our Opinion, April 22).
 
Levy claims that our right to have firearms locked in our cars in a parking lot 
is not about the Second Amendment but about the mythical right of corporations 
to usurp the Constitution and ban guns. But Levy didn't pull it off because we 
can see the truth. And the price he's asking us to pay for permission to do 
business with an anti-gun corporation could mean losing our lives - and that 
price is as clear as the sky is blue.
 
The Legislature passed, and Gov. Charlie Crist signed, a law to preserve the 
self-defense rights of law-abiding men and women in public parking lots. It 
reaffirms existing rights that have been jeopardized by politically motivated 
corporate policies.
 
Big business fought this measure, feigning corporate "private property rights" 
- a baseless argument considering that business consents to laws that limit 
property rights. Corporations must abide by civil rights laws, zoning laws, 
safety inspections and fire codes among others. Laws even dictate the number, 
size and placement of parking places and mandate space for shopping cart 
storage in publicly accessible parking lots.
 
Even Barry Richard, the attorney hired by the Florida Chamber to pitch its 
side, has acknowledged the truth.  In a March 24, 2006, opinion paid for by the 
chamber, Richard honestly admitted, "The right to control one's property is not 
absolute. The state can regulate use of and access to property for the purpose 
of protecting the public health, safety and welfare. State statutes, for 
example, prohibit the possession of certain materials on private property that 
constitute a public nuisance or safety hazard ... or the exclusion from public 
accommodations based upon race, gender, handicap, religion or national origin."
 
Clearly, the state can - and did - act to protect the right of law-abiding 
citizens to protect themselves when traveling and in publicly accessible 
parking lots. It is definitely a safety issue, as a living person is clearly 
more important than an asphalt parking lot.
 
NRA believes in private property rights, but unlike citizens, corporations are 
discretionary creations of government. They come into existence through 
charters created by legislatures. Corporate interests don't override the 
constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens.
 
Shrill arguments for property rights or profits must not take precedence over 
the lives of hardworking men and women. An employer's political philosophy or 
contempt for firearms rights does not trump a law-abiding person's fundamental, 
right to self-protection.
 
My motivation in teasing my grandchildren was simply to teach them to stand up 
for what they can see with their own eyes and what they know is true. Although 
Levy may continue to claim it's not about the Second Amendment, that clearly 
doesn't make it true.
 
Marion P. Hammer is past president of the National Rifle Association and 
executive director of Unified Sportsmen of Florida.
 
http://www2.tbo.com/content/2008/apr/25/na-its-about-the-second-amendment-and-nothing-else/
 
 
 
 
Professor Joseph Olson, J.D., LL.M.                        o-  651-523-2142  
Hamline University School of Law (MS-D2037)         f-   651-523-2236
St. Paul, MN  55113-1235                                      c-  612-865-7956
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to