-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 1:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Volokh] Eugene Volokh: An 1830 Source Casually Assuming
theIndividual Rights View of the Second Amendment:

Posted by Eugene Volokh:
An 1830 Source Casually Assuming the Individual Rights View of the
Second Amendment:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_07_06-2008_07_12.shtml#121554766
3


   For an analysis similar to what I quoted [1]below-- down to the
   analogy between the limits on the right to bear arms and the limits
on
   the freedom of the press, see the argument of [2]Ichabod Bartlett (a
   leading New Hampshire lawyer, Congressman, and speaker of the New
   Hampshire House of Representative) in Upham v. Hill (1830):

     What is liberty of person? -- liberty of speech? Are we not free?
     But have we a right to knock down and trample upon all whom we may
     dislike? ... We have too the right of bearing arms. And if we are
     not permitted to throw a brand into our neighbor's dwelling -- or
     discharge our rifle upon the passers by in the street -- we could
     as well complain of being enslaved -- as to say the press is
     shackled, because it may not, by falsehood, assault the character
     of any and every citizen, when and where its conductors may choose.

   This clearly assumes the right to bear arms as an individual right to
   possess or carry a gun (it's not clear which). This is weaker
evidence
   than the views of [3]Judge Martin, because it's only a lawyer's
   argument to a jury. But a skilled lawyer such as Bartlett would make
   such an argument (especially given the easy availability of other
   analogies) only if he thought the right to bear arms would be
   uncontroversially seen as an individual right by the jurors.

   Note also that this had to be a reference to the Second Amendment or
   to some national consensus about the right to bear arms, and not to a
   state constitutional provision: New Hampshire had no right to bear
   arms provision in its state constitution until [4]1982.

References

   1.
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_07_06-2008_07_12.shtml#121554627
9
   2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ichabod_Bartlett
   3.
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_07_06-2008_07_12.shtml#121554627
9
   4. http://www.trolp.org/main_pgs/issues/v11n1/Volokh.pdf

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to