Phil penned: > It isn't clear to me whether this part of the comment "All I can say is > that I wonder how the gun lobby was able to buy 5 members of the Supreme > Court?" is a serious question or how it relates to Herz's article? > > If it is a seriously intended question, I believe the questioner has > taken leave of his senses.
I was not familiar with "Gun Crazy", so I wanted to give it a quick read before commenting (http://www.saf.org/LawReviews/Herz1.html). I didn't bother reading the whole screed as a loss of senses permeated the opening and closing paragraphs. The level of displayed paranoia (such as the emailed claim that the gun lobby [whoever the hell they are] could acquire Supreme Court justices for cash) would lead me to recommend institutionalization for Herz. Likewise "how the gun lobby was able to buy 5 members of the Supreme Court" comes from the same anti-analytical mindset as those who believe the Supremes illegally threw the 2000 election. I'm assuming that Raymond is pulling our leg for a Sunday afternoon giggle. Guy Smith Gun Facts: Debunking Gun Control Myths www.GunFacts.info _______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
