On the Nomination of Eric H. Holder, Jr., for Attorney General of the United 
States
Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Committee
January 16, 2009
Stephen P. Halbrook

Serious concerns exist concerning the nomination of Eric Holder for
Attorney General regarding rights under the Second Amendment to the
United States Constitution. His denial that law-abiding citizens have
a right to keep and bear arms for lawful purposes is exemplified by
his support for draconian proposal to criminalize, with severe felony
penalties, exercise of that constitutional right.

Mr. Holder recently joined in an amici curiae brief in District of
Columbia v. Heller arguing that the Second Amendment does not
guarantee individual rights and supporting the D.C. handgun ban. It
states: "Amici disagree with the current position of the United
States Department of Justice that the Second Amendment protects an
individual right to keep and bear arms for purposes unrelated to a
State's operation of a well-regulated militia."[1] The brief relies
in part on arguments by an attorney for the Violence Policy Center, a
firearm prohibitionist lobby.[2]

http://www.independent.org/issues/article.asp?id=2411

CSPAN footage at http://www.independent.org/blog/?p=994

-- 

Charles Curley                  /"\    ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Looking for fine software       \ /    Respect for open standards
and/or writing?                  X     No HTML/RTF in email
http://www.charlescurley.com    / \    No M$ Word docs in email

Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0  809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to