Don't have the article but I've included the most likely candidates where I know them.
> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 7:31:21 AM >Subject: post-Heller cases question >The New England Journal of Medicine published another anti-gun rights essay. >I don't subscribe, but read comments on it. Perhaps the original has >footnotes, but a quoted section lists several post-Heller decisions that I >>have no reason to believe without checking. >Could someone reply with the case citations, please? > o One case upheld a provision that prohibited people under restraining > orders for domestic abuse from having a gun, Could this be reference to U.S. v White? (10 year old DV misdemeanor conviction means lifetime loss of 2A rights) > o one upheld a provision that ex-felons may not own a gun, http://volokh.com/posts/1215491766.shtml (Johnson v United States) > o one upheld a federal law making possession of machine guns illegal, http://volokh.com/files/mullenix.pdf (U.S. v Mullenix) If this is the case it's the least accurate description of the group. > o one upheld a law that made it illegal to have a firearm in a glove > compartment of a locked car in a parking lot of a post office, and http://volokh.com/files/dorosan.pdf (U.S. v Dorosan) > o one found that the right to have a firearm in one's home did not extend to > one's car. I'm not sure how this is different than the point above. _______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
